Molecular Evolution of Hepatitis Viruses
Introduction Five hepatitis viruses (HV)
are known to date. Infection by enterically-transmitted viruses (HAV and HEV)
causes acute hepatitis and is generally benign compared to the disease caused
by parenterally-transmitted viruses (HBV, HCV and HDV), for which chronic
infection may lead to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Some types of HDV have
also been associated to a high frequency of fulminant hepatitis. In addition to
these viruses, other viruses have been discovered and initially proposed as
causative agents of hepatitis, like GBV-C, TTV and SenV. The association with
hepatitis was later discarded.
Molecular biology and replication of
hepatitis viruses All but one (HBV) of the HV are RNA viruses. This fact
implies that they use RNA polymerases – and for HBV a retrotranscriptase - for
replication, which lack proofreading. capacity, leading to generation of
mutations 104 more frequently than human DNA polymerase, for example.
Enterically transmitted viruses.
HAV is a non-enveloped virus which
belongs to the genus Hepatovirus, of the family Picornaviridae. As an RNA
virus, replication occurs entirely in the cytoplasm. HAV genome is a single
positive stranded ARN of 7.5 Kb, with an Internal Ribosome Entry Side (IRES) at
its 5´ non-coding region. It encodes for a polyprotein of aproximately 2.200
aminoacids. This polyprotein is cleaved by celular and viral proteases to
produce 11 proteins and among them the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. This
polymerase produces the antigenomic negative strand RNA which serves as template
for generation of genomic positive strand RNAs, which will be inserted into the
assembling viral capsids to be liberated by exocytosis throughout the cell HEV
is a non-enveloped virus classified as a Hepevirus, in the family Hepeviridae. Infection
with HEV is responsible for a high percentage of fulminant hepatitis in
pregnant women. The HEV genome is a positive single-stranded RNA of
aproximately 7.2 kb, with a 5´-methylguanine cap and a 3´- polyA stretch. It
contains three partially overlapping open reading frames.
ORF1, coding for non structural proteins
including the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase,
ORF2, coding for the viral capsid
protein, and
ORF3, which might function as a viral
accessory protein affecting the host response to infection.
HEV replication is not completely known.
After releasing of viral RNA in the cytosol, ORF1 is translated into the
polyprotein, generating the replication complex. It is believed that negative
RNA intermediates are then produced, for the synthesis of genomic as well as
subgenomic positive RNAs, these latter translated into the capsid and ORF3
proteins. Positive genomic RNA is package in the capsids for liberation of HEV
through exocytosis.
Hepatitis
B virus
HBV is an enveloped virus belonging to
the genus Hepadnavirus, in the family Hepadnaviridae. This family includes
several genera of partially double stranded DNA generated from an intermediate
RNA through reverse transcription. HBV genome is around 3,200 bases long, the
smallest of all known animal viruses. The viral genome encodes four overlapping
ORFs:
S, coding for the viral surface envelope
proteins,
C, coding for the capsid and e antigen
proteins,
P, coding for the polymerase,
functionally divided into the terminal protein domain, which is involved in
encapsidation and initiation of minus-strand synthesis; the reverse
transcriptase (RT) domain, which catalyzes genome synthesis; and the
ribonuclease H domain, which degrades pregenomic RNA.
X, coding for a protein with multiple
functions, including signal transduction, transcriptional activation, DNA
repair, and inhibition of protein degradation.
After entry into the cell, the viral
capsids are directed to the nucleus. The single-stranded gap region in the
viral genome is repaired and circularized to a covalently closed circular form.
This circular DNA is the template for transcription of the pregenomic and
several subgenomic messenger RNAs. Pregenomic RNA is retrotranscribed inside
the capsids by the HBV polymerase. The nucleocapsids are then directed to the
endoplasmic reticulum to interact with the envelope proteins and assemble into
mature virions, which are then secreted outside the cell.
Hepatitis
D virus
HDV, genus deltavirus, is the smallest
animal RNA virus, and is related to plant viroids and satellite viruses. In
contrast to plant satellite viruses, HDV is able to perform autounomous
replication, but depends on coinfection with HBV, since it uses its viral
surface antigen for assembling its virion. Unlike other RNA viruses, HDV lacks
an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, by using the cellular RNA polymerases of the
host, which recognize its genome because of its folded, rod-like structure.
Three forms of RNA are made in the host during replication: circular genomic
and antigenomic RNA, and polyadenylated antigenomic mRNA, which codes for the
only protein coded in this genome, the HDAg. Two forms of HDAg are produced by
RNA edition. Replication of the circular HDV RNA template occurs via a rolling
mechanism similar to that of plant viroids. A viral ribozyme selfcleaves the
linear HDV RNA. These monomers are then ligated to form circular RNA, which
interacts with HDAg and uses HBV empty surface antigen particles for assembling
the HDV virions.
Hepatitis
C virus
HCV belongs to the genus Hepacivirus, in
the family Flaviviridae. It is an enveloped virus with a positive RNA of around
9.5 Kb, which codes for a polyprotein of around 3,000 amino acids, including an
RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. HCV
interacts with a series of receptor to enter the cell via endocytosis, from
which the capsid released the viral RNA in a membranous web close to the
Endoplasmic reticulum, where replication takes place. The translated
polyprotein is co- and post-translationally modified to produce mature viral
proteins which can form replication complexes and assemble into new virions.
These progeny virions bud into the lumen of the ER and leave the host cell
through the secretory pathway.
Other parenterally-transmitted
viruses historically associated with hepatitis. In addition to the well established
hepatitis viruses, 3 other parenterally-transmitted viruses have been
identified, GBV-C (formerly known as HGV), TTV and SEN-V. However, the real
role of these new viruses as causative agents of hepatitis is uncertain. There
is no evidence at the present that these viruses cause any pathology in humans. A tentative genus has been proposed for GBV-C, Pegivirus,
and 6 genotypes of GBV-C have been described. Genotype 1 is more prevalent in
Africa, genotype 2 in Europe and North America, and genotypes 3, 4 and 5 are
found mainly in Asia. GBV-C genotype 3 circulates among Central and South
American population groups, a finding that may be related to the Asiatic origin
of the American man. These findings suggest an old origin of GBV-C.
TTV is a single-stranded DNA virus, of
around 3.8 Kb, distantly related to circoviruses and classified in the genus.
TTV represents in fact a swarm of viruses, which chronically infects human and
other animals, and was originally thought to be associated with hepatitis.
However, there does not seem to be any link between TTV infection and HCC or
chronic hepatitis. Up to 23 genotypes of TTV have been described, which are
grouped in 5 genogroups. One of these genogroups comprises SEN-V, another virus
initially associated with hepatitis. Preliminary evidence suggests that some
SEN-V types may be associated to hepatitis, although this association could be
a casual event, and then not meaning that SEN-V is actually a true hepatotropic
virus.
Genetic
diversity of hepatitis viruses
Enterically
transmitted viruses
HAV variants can be classified in 6
genotypes, 3 of them infecting humans and the other 3 other primates from the
Old World. Genotype I, and particularly subgenotype IA, is the most prevalent
around the world. Interestingly, in countries with intermediate to high
prevalence of HAV infection, like Latin America and Africa, HAV genotype I is
highly predominant, being exclusively found in several countris from South
America, where a higher diversity would be expected due to the high frequency
of infection. A founder effect, like observed for human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) subtype B in the Americas, may account for this situation. In addition,
HAV has adopted a naturally highly deoptimized codon usage with respect to that
of its cellular host. This characteristic suggests a fine-tuning translation
kinetics selection as the underlying mechanism of the codon usage bias in this
specific genome region. Moreover, significant differences in codon usage are
found among the different genotypes. These differences might be a factor that
might bring some adaptative advantage to HAV genotype I and particularly
subgenotype IA. Four genotypes have been reported for HEV. Two of these
genotypes are endemic among swines and other mammals. An interesting feature of
this disease is that two modes of transmission seem to prevail in different
geographic regions: human to human transmission in highly endemic regions, like
Central and Southeat Asia, the Middle East and North Africa, where the most
commons genotypes are 1 and 2, the human ones, and
a zoonotic transmission linked to
contact and/or consumption of swines and other susceptible mammals, in
non-endemic regions, like Europe, Japan and the Americas, with a more frequent
circulation of the animal genotypes 3 and 4. These zoonotic reservoirs might
explain the presence of HEV infection in non endemic areas and in isolated
populations, like Amerindians, where evidence of exposure to HEV has been
documented.
HBV
The absence of proof reading capacity of
the HBV reverse transcriptase leads to a high mutation rate. On the other hand,
the extreme overlapping of the open reading frames of this small viral genome reduces
the viability of many of these mutations. For these opposite characteristics,
the substitution rate of HBV is intermediate between RNA and DNA viruses. Another
implication of this enhanced potential variability is the generation of a
quasispecies-like viral population, harboring viral mutations that can be
eventually selected under particular selection pressures. The quasispecies
complexity is however modulated by the compact genome organization of this
virus.
In addition to the diversity which
occurs during the natural course of infection, another degree of variability is
displayed by HBV strains circulating worldwide. This variability includes the
vaccine escape mutants and the genotypic and subtypic variability.
Vaccine escape mutants occur by point
mutations in the “a” determinant of the surface antigen, the main immunogenic
region, induce conformational changes that prevent the binding of neutralizing
antibodies. The most frequent substitutions observed with these characteristics
are G145R and D144A. In addition to their transmission between individuals,
vaccine escape mutants might be selected under the pressure of neutralizing antibodies
or antiretroviral drugs.
Eight human HBV genotypes (A–H) have
been described, based on a minimum divergence of 8% of the complete genome
sequences. Genotypes A and D are predominant in the Old World but are also
widely distributed in all the continents. Genotypes B and C are found mainly in
South East Asia and the Far East, while genotype E circulates. HBV genotype E
might be a recent genotype, exhibitig a low intragenotypic variation not being
introduced to the Americas during slave trade.
The distribution of genotype G is not
fully known. This genotype exhibit several interesting characteristics. A low
intragenotypic variability has been found among different isolates from
different countries. A high frequency of mutations in the core and precore
regions and a frequent association of co-circulation with HBV genotype A have
also been reported. This last finding has lead even to the suggestion that the
genotype G represents an impaired virus which needs a helper virus for
effective replication. However, transmission and infection with exclusively
HBVgenotype G has recently been documented. On the other hand, a segment of the
press region is identical in genotype E and G strains, suggesting an eventual
recombination between these two genotypes. This last assumption might also
suggest an African origin for genotype G, although this genotype has not been
found. This genotype is might be found more frequently in co-infection with HIV.
Alternatively, HBV genotype G is found frequently infecting men who have sex
with men (MSM). The core variability displayed by HBV genotype G (a 12 amino
acid insertion at the N-terminal end) has been shown frecently that migh be
affecting the ability of assembly and secretion of the viral particle, which
supports the assumption for the need of a coinfecting strain for an efficient
replication of this genotype.
Some of the HBV genotypes are divided
into subgenotypes, based on a divergence of more than 4%. Seven subgenotypes
are described at the moment for genotype A, 9 for genotype B, 12 for genotype C,
7 for gebnotype D and 4 for genotype. No subgenotypes have been found at
present inside genotypes E, G and H. This fact migh be due to the fact that
these genotypes might be more recent than the other ones.
HBV genotype F is the most divergent of
the HBV genotypes, is autochthonous to and highly predominant in some countries
of South America. HBV genotype H is closely related to genotype F and seems to
be restricted to Central and North America. In addition to human HBV genotypes,
several simian genotypes have also been identified, one in a monkey from the
New World (woolly monkey), while the others have been found infecting simians
from the Old World.
In addition, a new genotype I have been
proposed for a recombinant of genotypes A, C, and G mainly found in Laos and
Vietnam, genotype J for a recombinant strain between human and ape viruses. Indeed,
several studies have pointed that recombination seems to play an important role
in shaping the evolution of HBV. The exact mechanism of recombination of HBV
genomes is not clear, but it seems more likely to occur in the nucleus, by
illegitimate replication. or by recombination with integrated HBV DNA
HBV variability seems to play a role in
HCC development. Pathogenic differences in causing HCC have been reported among
hepatitis B virus (HBV) variants, but also genotypes. HBV genotype C is
associated with a more severe disease, and genotype D seems to evolve worse
than genotype A. HBV genotype F was associated to a higher frequency of HCC
development at younger age in Alaskan individuals. However, the risk of HCC may
differ among subgenotypes.
Several variants are generated during
the course of the chronic infection in response to the host or exogenous immune
pressures and drug therapy. Mutations in the Precore, Core, X, Pre-S, S and Pol
gen, have been reported. Particular interest has been directed toward the
generation of translational stop codon mutation at the precore region (mostly
G1896A) inside the ε structure, and mutations in the basal core promoter region
(especially A1762T, G1764A) and the upstream regulatory sequences
(nt1643-1742). The selection of the G1896A seems to be genotype-dependent. The
basal core promoter overlaps with the X region of the HBV genome, and mutations
in the amino acid sequences at positions 130 and 131 in this region (K130M and
V131I) has been proposed as prognostic markers for the development of liver
cancer. Some genotypic variability may also occur in terms of interferon
sensitivity and development of drug resistance.
The current treatment for HBV involves
the use of Interferon (IFN) and/or antiretroviral drugs, since some of the
anti-HIV reverse transcriptase drugs can also inhibits the HBV polymerase.
Although no specific mutations have been associated to IFN resistance, some
genotypes are more susceptible to this immunomodulator, like genotypes A and B,
compared to D and C. Five nucleoside and nucleotide analogues inhibit HBV
reverse transcriptase: Adefovir, Entevavir, Lamivudine, Telbivudine and
Tenefovir. Drug resistance mutations emerge during treatment with these drugs,
consisting of point mutation in one of the 5 domains of the HBV polymerase.
The origin of HBV is still an unsolved
question. The reduced size of HBV genome, together with the high degree of
overlapping of its open reading frames, has impaired the drawing of an
evolutionary picture of this virus. With the advent of sequences from several
HBV strains circulating in non human primates, an alternative hypothesis has
been proposed: human HBV genotypes might have emerged through several zoonotic
introductions from simian strains, both at the Old and New World.
HDV
Eight genotypes of HDV have been
identified. HDV genotype 1 is present worldwide. Genotype 2 is found in Japan,
Taiwan, Russia. Genotype 3 is the most divergent genotype and is found in the
Amazon Basin, and has been shown to infect individuals from Peru, Venezuela and
Colombia, where severe cases have been documented. This genotype is actually
the most frequently associated to fulminant hepatitis. Genotype 4 circulates in
Taiwan and Japan. The remaining HDV genotypes (5–8) are found Africa. As other
RNA viruses, HDV circulates as a quasispecies distribution of variants, in
which defective mutants have being described. In addition mutants appearing
under the immune pressure, as detected by the presence of amino acids under
positive selection, target of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, have also been described.
HCV
HCV has been classified in 7 genotypes,
according to a genetic divergence of more than 30- 35% in the complete genome
and in several subtypes inside each genotype, according to divergences of more
than 20%. Infections with HCV genotype 1 are associated with the lowest
therapeutic success. HCV genotypes 1, 2, and 3 have a worldwide distribution.
HCV subtypes 1a and 1b are the most common genotypes in the US and are also are
predominant in Europe, while in Japan, subtype 1b is predominant. Although HCV
subtypes 2a and 2b are relatively common in America, Europe, and Japan, subtype
2c is found commonly in northern Italy. HCV genotype 3a is frequent in
intravenous drug abusers in Europe and the United States. HCV genotype 4 is
prevalent in Africa and the Middle East, and genotypes 5 and 6 seem to be
confined to South Africa and Asia, respectively. HCV genotype 7 was more
recently identified in Canada, in an emigrant from the Democratic Republic of
Congo.
In contrast with HBV, recombination
between HCV genotypes seems to be a rare event. In vitro studies suggest a low
frequency of recombination for this virus in agreement with the low number of
recombinant strains identified so far. However, intergenotypic incompatibility
might be a factor involved in the low frequency of recombinants observed, and
intragenotypic recombination might be more frequent than expected.
Changes in hepatitis C virus (HCV)
genotype distribution with time have been reported in several countries. In
Venezuela, for example, a significant reduction of the circulation of HCV
genotype 1b was observed in the last decade, with the increase of circulation
of genotype. Several subtypes of HCV genotype 2 and 4 were introduced in some
countries of the Americas during slave trade in Martinique. and of HCV genotype
2 in Venezuela It is difficult to estimate for how long HCV has been present in
human populations. HCV may have been endemic in Asia and Africa for a
considerably longer time than in Western countries. HCV subtypes might have
diverged around 200-250 years ago and genotypes around 500-2000 years ago.
HCV genotype 1b has been frequently
associated with a more severe liver disease. Nevertheless, this association
might be due to the fact that individuals infected with this genotype have a
longer mean duration of infection (Zein, 2000). A recent meta-analysis showed
however HCV subtype 1b associated to a higher risk factor for HCC development. Hepatic
steatosis is a common consequence of HCV infection, has been recently
associated with the development of HCC, and is more frequently found among HCV
genotype 3 infected patients. More studies are needed to confirm the
correlation between HCV genotype 3, the presence of steatosis and progression
to HCC.
Within an infected individual, HCV
circulates as a collection of closely related variants named quasispecies. HCV
like others RNA virus has a high level of genetic variability, especially in
the E1 and E2 genes (envelope glycoproteins). Humoral pressure on the
hypervariably region of E2 has been associated with quasispecies
diversification through immune escape mechanisms. The quasispecies nature of
HCV populations in an infected individual might contribute to the viral
persistence in the host, IFN and drug resistance.
HIV
co-infection
HIV co-infection with HCV and/or HBV is
frequent, since these viruses share many modes of transmission, and exacerbates
the natural history of these viral infections. A decreased immune clearance and
more rapid progression of liver disease has been documented, leading to an
increased incidence of cirrhosis, risk of drug-related hepatoxicity, HCC
development, and death. On the other hand, liver disease has emerged as a major
cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. Viral hepatitis
co-infection increases the risk of drug-related hepatoxicity of highly active
antiretroviral therapy (HAART), impacting the selection of specific agents.
HIV-1 co-infection
increases HCV viral load in dually infected patients. This effect seems to be
both related to the acquired immunodeficiency and to a direct interaction
between the viruses. In addition, HIV-1 co-infection seems to impact the
quasispecies complexity exhibited by HCV. Both an increase and a decrease of
quasispecies heterogeneity has been described, when compared to HCV
mono-infected patients (Sherman et al. In spite of the conflicting results,
many reports suggest a relatively low level of HCV quasispecies diversity
before HAART, and an increase in diversity after prolonged treatment,
principally due to a significant increase in both synonymous and non-synonymous
substitution rates in the hypervariable region 1 of HCV E2. This exponential
growth of the quasispecies populations in immunological responders coincides
with a peak in CD4 cell counts, positive selection in several proteins of HCV,
and a frequent increase in HCV viral load Patients co-infected with HBV and
HIV-1 have a higher likelihood of chronicity after acute HBV infection compared
with HIV-negative patients. The natural history of HBV-related disease is
modified by HIV infection in several ways. Co-infected patients have higher HBV
DNA levels, lower aminotransferase levels, decreased spontaneous loss of
hepatitis B early antigen (HBeAg), accelerated progression to cirrhosis, and
increased risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality compared with HBV
monoinfection. As previously mentioned, a number of clinically significant HBV
genome mutations have been reported in HBV mono-infection, and differences in
disease evolution and treatment response have been associated to a particular
genotype and to some of these mutations. Many of these mutations appears during
the long term evolution of infection and during exposure to nucleos(t)ides
analogs, used to treat HIV (Lacombe et al., 2010). In HIV-1/HBV co-infected individuals,
a novel –1G mutation in the HBV core and precore gene was found to be more
frequent compared to mono-infected patients. This mutation results in premature
termination of the deduced HBV precore and core genes and was associated with
high HBV viral load. PreS2 deletions were observed more frequently in
co-infection.
An interesting observation is that the
natural course of HIV-1 might be modulated by the presence of GBV-C. GBV-C
co-infection seems to exert a beneficial effect on HIV disease progression,
although this evidence has not been consistently corroborated. The mechanism by
which GBV-C interferes with AIDS progression is not yet fully undestood. In
vitro studies have shown that the inhibitory effect of GBV-C on HIV-1
replication might be related to solubles factors induced by GBV-C, and
specifically with chemokines, Rantes, MIP-1 and SDF-1, which may compete with
HIV-1 envelop glycoprotein 120 for the correceptor CCR5 and CXCR4 in CD4 cells.
This effect may reduce a successful HIV-1 interaction with infected cell. Several
lines of evidence suggest a possible inhibition of HIV-1 by GBV-C through
increase in soluble ligands for HIV-1 correceptor and activation of innate
immunity. In addition, the beneficial effect of GBV-C on survival of HIV-1
infected patients might be genotype specific. Two GBV-C proteins, E2 and NS5A,
have been shown to modulate CD4+ T-lymphocyte chemokine receptor expression and
chemokine release in vitro, then inhbiting HIV replication. The inhibitory
effect of GBV-C NS5A on HIV-1 replication was exerced in vitro by the non
structural proteins from all the genotypes tested, failing then to describe a
genotype specific inhibition of this protein in HIV-1 replication. More studies
are needed to clarify the exact role of GBV-C co-infection on HIV-1
replication.
Conclusions.
There are still 5 viral entities named
hepatitis viruses, which share only their tropism for the hepatocyte.
Parenterally transmitted viruses are normally the ones associated to chronicity
and to more severe sequela, like cirrhosis and HCC. Due to the error prone
nature of their polymerases, these viruses display a substantial degree of
genetic diversity. Within these 5 viral entities, viral variants (genotypes,
subgenotypes, diversity of quasispecies, mutants) might exhibit particular
characteristics in term of pathogenesis and mode of transmission. Thus, instead
of 5 viruses, we are in fact dealing with a multiplicity of viral variants with
different consequences and evolution inside the infected host. Vaccines are not
available for all these entities, only for HAV and HBV, and partially for HDV.
The significant degree of variability exhibited by these viruses is an
unresolved limitation for the development of effective vaccines against them.
Some of these variants might have originated separately in the New and the Old
World, as for HBV and HDV, for example. Some of these viruses may have a long
time of co-evolution with human host, as for GBV-C, while others might have
been introduced more recently, like HCV.




Comments
Post a Comment